Nationwide Employment Lawyers
Legal enquiries and clients : 0333 242 3851
Get in Touch
Service Rating: Damian McCarthy 5 starts - Service Rate
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Howell John
    • Damian McCarthy
    • Simon Armstrong
    • Case Studies
    • Employment Law News
  • Employee Services
    • Questionnaire
    • Contact
    • Locations
    • Dismissal
    • Whistleblowing Law
    • Discrimination
      • Sex discrimination
        • Maternity rights in employment
        • Pregnancy or maternity discrimination
        • Returning to work and flexible working
        • Health and safety for pregnant women in the workplace
        • Sexual Harassment
      • Disability discrimination
      • Race discrimination
    • Equal Pay
    • Bullying and Harassment
    • Family Friendly Rights
    • Disciplinary and grievance hearings
    • Contracts
    • Transfer of Undertakings
    • Agency workers and part time workers
    • Privacy at work
    • Constructive dismissal
    • Resignation letter templates
      • Constructive dismissal letter template
      • Standard notice resignation letter template:
      • Short or long notice request template
    • Health and Safety at Work
  • Locations
    • London – Berkeley Square
    • London – Canary Wharf
    • London – Croydon
    • London – Hammersmith
    • London – High Holborn
    • London – King’s Cross
    • London – Liverpool Street
    • London – London Bridge
    • London – Richmond
  • Case Studies
    • A v PWC
    • P v S (confidential)
    • Moira Stuart quits, reigniting BBC ageism row
    • Married HBOS bank manager propositioned by colleagues
  • News
  • FAQ
  • Contact



Dorchester Hotel May Face Legal Action Over Staff Grooming Rules

The Dorchester may be one of the most luxurious hotels in the UK but no business is powerful enough to dictate how female staff should groom their bodies as the hotel is planning to.

 

A list of the rules the business plans to implement for their female staff has been criticised after it was emailed to staff by the hotel’s managers; subsequently causing outrage due to the excessive demand it intends to place on female employees’ appearances.

 

The five-star hotel claims its new rules are the result of customer complaints over the hygiene of staff members, but the nature of the demands is deeply unfair. The list states women are not to report for work if they have ‘oily skin’, ‘bad breath’ or ‘garish makeup’, along with suggestions that they manicure their fingernails, shave their legs and wear formal dresses.

 

Dress codes and an appropriate appearance are essential for ensuring the desired image of a hotel is projected, but the detail required by the Dorchester shows an objectification of these women which can be considered a form of discrimination as it reflects an assumption of what femininity should be rather than an individual’s personal freedom.

 

The dress codes outlined by the list can also be considered impractical to perform certain tasks, such as hindering a female waitress’s ability to move easily.

 

There is also concern that expectations such as removal of hair could encroach on the religious freedom of expression of some workers. Worker rights against such discrimination is protected under the 2010 Equality Act, which defends employee ‘protected characteristics’, including age, religion, sexuality, disability and gender.

 

Requirements like manicures are also unfair, as the expense of such beauty treatment is expected to be shouldered by workers. A rule like this should at the very least be supported by financial support from the employer; especially as workers in the hospitality industry often struggle financially.

 

Many workers from certain ethnic background may also be unable to follow the rules due to their natural skin and hair types being unsuitable for such modifications. It does seem that the Dorchester’s rules require women to conform to a specific westernised idea of femininity.

 

The Dorchester’s list of rules has already been criticised by many professionals. Chief executive of the Fawcett Society, Sam Smethers, believes ‘employers should concentrate on what enables people to do a good job and what drives productivity’ rather than their looks.

 

In an anonymous interview with the Daily Mail, a female Dorchester worker stated the treatment was ‘like something out of the dark ages and downright offensive. It’s not as though you choose to have oily skin, and a lot of women, especially teenagers, cannot help it […] The women are all pretty livid but worry that if they complain or rebel they’ll be sacked on the spot.”

 

It also cannot be overlooked that these new rules focus solely on female employees rather than male. A new dress code or grooming policy should also apply to men wherever such an equivalent is possible. However, no requirements exist for men other than the standard practice of maintaining a level of presentation that supports the existing professionalism of the hotel industry.

 

Roland Fasel, the Dorchester’s general manager, has defended the new rules as an effort to ‘uphold world-leading hospitality standards, including grooming, in line with many other brands.’

 




Social Share
  • google-share

Our specialist areas of law

  • Employment Tribunals
    • Employment Tribunals London
  • Dismissal
    • Unfair Dismissal
    • Constructive Dismissal & Resignation Advice
    • Compromise agreements
    • Executive Dismissal
    • Whistleblowing Law
    • Redundancy claims
    • Age Discrimination & Redundancy – Protection for all Ages In Redundancy
    • Collective redundancy
  • Whistleblowing
    • Whistleblowing Law
  • Discrimination (overview)
    • Discrimination at work – overview
  • –– Sex Discrimination
    • Maternity rights in employment
    • Pregnancy or maternity discrimination
    • Returning to work and flexible working
    • Health and safety issues for pregnant women in the workplace
  • –– Disability discrimination
    • Disability discrimination
  • –– Race discrimination
    • Race discrimination
  • –– Age discrimination
    • Age discrimination in recruitment and selection
    • Age discrimination – your rights at retirement
    • Age discrimination and redundancy – protection for all ages in redundancy
    • Age discrimination and pensions
    • Age discrimination and benefits
  • –– Sexual-orientation discrimination
    • Sexual-orientation discrimination in goods and services
  • –– Religious discrimination
    • Religious discrimination
  • –– Gender reassignment discrimination
    • Gender reassignment discrimination
  • Equal pay
    • Equal pay
  • Bullying and Harassment
    • Bullying and harrasment at work
  • Family-friendly rights
    • Family leave
    • Maternity rights in employment
    • Pregnancy and maternity discrimination
    • Return to work and flexible working
    • Health and safety for pregnant women in the workplace
    • Paternity rights
    • Maternity
    • Part-time workers
  • Disciplinary and Grievance Hearings
    • Disciplinary Hearings & Procedures
    • Grievance procedures
  • Contracts
    • Bonus disputes and discrimination
    • Bonus disputes
    • Bonus discrimination & The Risks Associated With It
    • Contract disputes and permanent health insurance
    • Employment contract disputes – restrictive covenants
  • Transfer of Undertakings
    • Transfer of undertakings (TUPE)
  • Agency Workers and Part Time Workers
    • Agency workers
    • Part-time workers
  • Privacy at Work
    • Privacy at work
  • Letter Templates
    • Constructive dismissal letter template
    • Standard notice resignation letter template:
    • Short or long notice request template

Join our Newsletter!

Twitter

Damian McCarthy
  • I worked with Martin a few years ago on a lengthy case. Always seemed a man of integrity. https://t.co/CwTnxNq5QZ 08:49:06 PM May 19, 2023 from Twitter for iPhone ReplyRetweetFavorite
  • @NationCymru When I was a kid 1970’s - ‘80s always called “chip alley” … I think sometimes Caroline St. 08:47:37 PM May 19, 2023 from Twitter for iPhone in reply to NationCymru ReplyRetweetFavorite
  • @PhilipProudfoot What are you talking about ? King Charles unplugged my sink this morning and Camilla did my ironin… https://t.co/GawUMSYVH1 01:51:10 PM May 08, 2023 from Twitter for iPhone in reply to PhilipProudfoot ReplyRetweetFavorite
@dam_mccarthy

Contact Us

  • We will be able to help you quickly if you leave us a contact phone number. We keep this strictly confidential.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Copyright Notice | Disclaimer | Website Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement
ACAS | EHRC
Nationwide Employment Lawyers Ltd is Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. For peace of mind you can find information about our authorisation by checking the Registration number 838365 on the Financial Services Register : register.fca.org.uk. Please note all telephone calls are recorded, as required by the regulator. Nationwide Employment Lawyers Ltd is not a firm of solicitors. Instead we offer an exceptional level of service using specialist employment law Solicitors, Barristers and a Senior Advocate.
Please contact us using either the questionnaire, quick contact form (above) or telephoning us on 0333 242 3851.