Nationwide Employment Lawyers
Legal enquiries and clients : 0333 242 3851
Get in Touch
Service Rating: Damian McCarthy 5 starts - Service Rate
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Howell John
    • Damian McCarthy
    • Simon Armstrong
    • Case Studies
    • Employment Law News
  • Employee Services
    • Questionnaire
    • Contact
    • Locations
    • Dismissal
    • Whistleblowing Law
    • Discrimination
      • Sex discrimination
        • Maternity rights in employment
        • Pregnancy or maternity discrimination
        • Returning to work and flexible working
        • Health and safety for pregnant women in the workplace
        • Sexual Harassment
      • Disability discrimination
      • Race discrimination
    • Equal Pay
    • Bullying and Harassment
    • Family Friendly Rights
    • Disciplinary and grievance hearings
    • Contracts
    • Transfer of Undertakings
    • Agency workers and part time workers
    • Privacy at work
    • Constructive dismissal
    • Resignation letter templates
      • Constructive dismissal letter template
      • Standard notice resignation letter template:
      • Short or long notice request template
    • Health and Safety at Work
  • Locations
    • London – Berkeley Square
    • London – Canary Wharf
    • London – Croydon
    • London – Hammersmith
    • London – High Holborn
    • London – King’s Cross
    • London – Liverpool Street
    • London – London Bridge
    • London – Richmond
  • Case Studies
    • A v PWC
    • P v S (confidential)
    • Moira Stuart quits, reigniting BBC ageism row
    • Married HBOS bank manager propositioned by colleagues
  • News
  • FAQ
  • Contact



Can A Disciplinary Sanction Be Increased At Appeal?

In the case of McMillan v Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, the Court had to consider whether an employer is entitled to increase a disciplinary sanction if their employee had chosen to appeal.

 

Background

 

Miss McMillan, (the Claimant) was employed as a consultant obstetrician and gynecologist at Airedale NHS Foundation Trust (The Trust).

 

An allegation of misconduct led to disciplinary proceedings and Miss McMillan was issued with a final written warning. The misconduct allegation related to inconsistent accounts about exactly what had occurred at an adverse event in June 2010.

 

This sanction was appealed, and the Appeal Panel upheld the original findings of misconduct. Following this finding, the Appeal Panel took steps to reconvene in order to consider the appropriate sanction.

 

In the interim Miss McMillan purported to withdraw her appeal. She also commenced legal proceedings for an injunction, in order to prevent the Trust from reconvening (and considering the sanction.)

 

The Court had to decide upon two key issues:

 

1. Whether, on Miss McMillan’s appeal against sanction, the Panel is permitted under her contract of employment to impose a sanction more severe than the final written warning imposed by the first instance panel, and in particular whether it could terminate her employment with the Trust.

 

2. The second issue is whether Miss McMillan’s having at least purported to withdraw her appeal, could allow the Appeal Panel to proceed with considering a sanction consistent with her contract of employment. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/1031.html.

 

Decision

 

In the High Court, the decision was found against the Trust on both issues and therefore the Respondent appealed.

 

At the Court of Appeal, a key point of consideration was whether Miss McMillan’s contract of employment permitted the Appeal Panel to increase the original disciplinary sanction; and whether or not this could include terminating her employment.

 

The Court held that Miss McMillan’s contract of employment did not permit the Appeal Panel to increase the disciplinary sanction. They also held that it was relevant for the ACAS code to be expressly referred to as part of the Trust’s code of conduct.

 

This was relevant because the ACAS Guide to Disciplinary Procedures states that a sanction cannot be increased on appeal. They also took into consideration that should the sanction have been increased there would have been no further opportunity to appeal against this.

 

Finally, they agreed that should an increased sanction be imposed at appeal; this could be tantamount to a breach of contract.




Social Share
  • google-share

Our specialist areas of law

  • Employment Tribunals
    • Employment Tribunals London
  • Dismissal
    • Unfair Dismissal
    • Constructive Dismissal & Resignation Advice
    • Compromise agreements
    • Executive Dismissal
    • Whistleblowing Law
    • Redundancy claims
    • Age Discrimination & Redundancy – Protection for all Ages In Redundancy
    • Collective redundancy
  • Whistleblowing
    • Whistleblowing Law
  • Discrimination (overview)
    • Discrimination at work – overview
  • –– Sex Discrimination
    • Maternity rights in employment
    • Pregnancy or maternity discrimination
    • Returning to work and flexible working
    • Health and safety issues for pregnant women in the workplace
  • –– Disability discrimination
    • Disability discrimination
  • –– Race discrimination
    • Race discrimination
  • –– Age discrimination
    • Age discrimination in recruitment and selection
    • Age discrimination – your rights at retirement
    • Age discrimination and redundancy – protection for all ages in redundancy
    • Age discrimination and pensions
    • Age discrimination and benefits
  • –– Sexual-orientation discrimination
    • Sexual-orientation discrimination in goods and services
  • –– Religious discrimination
    • Religious discrimination
  • –– Gender reassignment discrimination
    • Gender reassignment discrimination
  • Equal pay
    • Equal pay
  • Bullying and Harassment
    • Bullying and harrasment at work
  • Family-friendly rights
    • Family leave
    • Maternity rights in employment
    • Pregnancy and maternity discrimination
    • Return to work and flexible working
    • Health and safety for pregnant women in the workplace
    • Paternity rights
    • Maternity
    • Part-time workers
  • Disciplinary and Grievance Hearings
    • Disciplinary Hearings & Procedures
    • Grievance procedures
  • Contracts
    • Bonus disputes and discrimination
    • Bonus disputes
    • Bonus discrimination & The Risks Associated With It
    • Contract disputes and permanent health insurance
    • Employment contract disputes – restrictive covenants
  • Transfer of Undertakings
    • Transfer of undertakings (TUPE)
  • Agency Workers and Part Time Workers
    • Agency workers
    • Part-time workers
  • Privacy at Work
    • Privacy at work
  • Letter Templates
    • Constructive dismissal letter template
    • Standard notice resignation letter template:
    • Short or long notice request template

Contact Us

  • We will be able to help you quickly if you leave us a contact phone number. We keep this strictly confidential.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Quick Links

Navigation

About Us
Employee Services
Locations
Case Studies
News
FAQs
Contact

Terms

Privacy statement
Terms

Copyright Notice | Disclaimer | Website Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement
ACAS | EHRC
Nationwide Employment Lawyers Ltd is Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. For peace of mind you can find information about our authorisation by checking the Registration number 838365 on the Financial Services Register : register.fca.org.uk. Please note all telephone calls are recorded, as required by the regulator. Nationwide Employment Lawyers Ltd is not a firm of solicitors. Instead we offer an exceptional level of service using specialist employment law Solicitors, Barristers and a Senior Advocate.
Please contact us using either the questionnaire, quick contact form (above) or telephoning us on 0333 242 3851.