Get in Touch
The dismissal of a senior employee can raise concerns internally and legally, especially when they have been blamed for broader organisational or operational problems. In some cases, this can result in what is commonly described as ‘scapegoating’.
Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, employees are protected against unfair dismissal where the employer does not have a fair reason for dismissal or fails to follow a fair and reasonable process in all the circumstances. Knowing how scapegoating situations arise, how the law assesses fairness in dismissal cases, and what legal options might be available can be beneficial if you are dismissed for a wider failing.
Why Senior Employees Can Be Exposed to Dismissal Risk
Senior employees are typically held responsible for strategic decisions and performance outcomes. This level of responsibility can leave individuals more vulnerable when organisational performance declines or expectations are not met.
In practice, employers might look to hold a senior employee accountable, particularly where outcomes fall short of expectations. This can occur even if wider structural, financial, or operational factors have contributed to the situation.
In some cases, concerns are not raised in a clear or structured way at an early stage. Instead, expectations evolve over time or are reframed in response to changing business priorities. This can make it difficult for senior employees to recognise when informal discussions or feedback have turned into formal performance management.
This is particularly common during periods of organisational change, such as restructures, redundancies, or changes in leadership, where performance concerns may be reassessed or presented in a different light after decisions have already begun to take shape.
How UK Law Assesses Unfair Dismissal
Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, a dismissal will generally be unfair unless the employer can show it was made on fair grounds, in which there is clear evidence of employee wrongdoing or underperformance at work. Tribunals will typically consider:
- Whether there was a fair reason for dismissal (such as conduct, capability, redundancy)
- Whether the employer followed a fair and reasonable process
- Whether dismissal fell within the ‘range of reasonable responses’
Even when there is a potentially fair reason, dismissal can still be unfair if the process is flawed, inconsistent, or inadequately evidenced. For senior employees, procedural fairness is particularly important. Tribunals will commonly examine whether:
- Concerns were clearly communicated
- The employee was given a genuine opportunity to respond or improve
- Performance or conduct issues were properly documented
- A structured performance process was considered where appropriate
- A reasonable investigation was carried out before dismissal
A failure in any of these areas can strengthen an unfair dismissal claim, even where the employer has raised concerns about performance.
Signs that Dismissal Might Involve Scapegoating
While every case depends on the facts, there are common indicators that suggest a dismissal involves scapegoating or an unfair allocation of responsibility.
One common sign is a lack of meaningful warning before the dismissal. Where concerns are only raised at the point of termination, or shortly beforehand, this can indicate that a fair performance process was not followed. Another indicator is inconsistency in how responsibility is allocated. If there were wider team, departmental, or organisational issues but only one individual was held accountable, this can raise questions about whether the decision was genuinely based on individual performance.
Unclear or shifting expectations can also be relevant. Senior employees should know what is expected of them, and if performance standards move without clear communication, it can become difficult to assess fairness. Other relevant indicators include situations where:
- Concerns appear to have been recorded retrospectively
- Documentation does not reflect the seriousness of the allegations
- The employer’s rationale changes over time
- Decisions appear to align with restructuring rather than performance
When considered together, these factors help Employment Tribunals assess whether the dismissal was a reasonable response to genuine performance concerns or whether accountability was unfairly attributed to one individual.
Procedure, Documentation and Settlement Outcomes
Procedural fairness is key to unfair dismissal claims under the Employment Rights Act 1996. Even when an employer has a fair reason, failing to follow a fair process can result in wrongful dismissal. Tribunals place significant weight on documentation, which can include:
- Employment contracts and job descriptions
- Performance reviews and appraisal records
- Emails relating to concerns, warnings, or decisions
- Meeting notes and investigation documentation
- Organisational restructuring plans
This evidence is often used to determine whether concerns were properly raised, whether the employee had a fair opportunity to respond, and whether dismissal was proportionate in the circumstances. If documentation is incomplete, inconsistent, or created retrospectively, it can weaken the employer’s position, particularly in senior-level disputes where expectations and responsibilities are more complex.
In many cases, disputes involving senior employees do not proceed to a full tribunal hearing. Instead, settlement agreements are used to resolve matters. These typically involve compensation and agreed exit terms, allowing both parties to avoid the uncertainty and reputational impact of litigation. However, it is important that employees fully understand the value of a settlement offer and its impact on potential legal claims. Independent legal advice is key before accepting a settlement agreement to help an employee make an informed decision.
The Next Steps for an Unfair Dismissal Claim
Senior dismissal cases can progress quickly, particularly when performance concerns escalate or settlement discussions arise. Contacting a legal professional can help clarify whether a dismissal is unfair under the Employment Rights Act 1996, assess the strength of any potential Tribunal claim, and identify the most appropriate way to respond.
Ultimately, dismissal from a senior role can raise complex legal and professional issues, particularly when an employee is made the scapegoat for a larger problem. If you are dealing with a potential unfair dismissal or senior employment dispute, contact Nationwide Employment Lawyers for clear, confidential advice on your situation.
We know how stressful and time-consuming it can be to deal with an employment law issue, and we have a superb record of representing our clients. Our expert employment lawyers fight hard to get results and will support you from beginning to end.
